Results will open in a new tab


Nora Roberts Foundation

Generative AI Policy

Nora Roberts Foundation Generative AI Policy

The Nora Roberts Foundation stands against the use of Generative AI and LLMs to create content, and as a replacement for human teachers, therapists, and companions. We oppose this use for ethical, environmental, and humanitarian reasons.

All staff and board of the Nora Roberts Foundation agree to this policy and will not utilize Generative AI to create any Nora Roberts Foundation content. This includes, but is not limited to, emails, websites, reports, social media, and graphics.

The Nora Roberts Foundation will not knowingly grant to any organization who teaches or uses Generative AI to make creative content. This includes teaching students how to create essays, stories, visual art, videos, music, or computer programs with Generative AI, using Generative AI to create published art or written works, and using chatbots to provide charitable services such as therapy or tutoring or other conversation beyond a simple search or password reset.

We include in Generative AI, creative content, writings, images, music, video, or code made by prompting a program such as ChatGPT, OpenAI, Sora, DALL-E, Midjourney, Claude, Gemini, GitHub Copilot, Suno, Sora, Stable Diffusion, Grammarly AI tools, and more. Generative AI and LLMs create works based on their consumption of training data, acquired by consuming the work of countless authors, artists, and internet users.  Without the express consent of the original author/artist/creator, we view the resulting output to be an infringement of intellectual property and a violation of copyright. We believe creators must explicitly consent to use of their content for the Generative AI’s models sourcing of content to reach ethical standards.

Regardless of the ethical implications, the energy needed to power the data centers used to train and run LLMs and Generative AI models impacts society. And the increased energy use, water consumption, and pollution affects people who live near data centers. While some AI is used for the good of humanity, such as in science and medicine, we don’t believe use of Generative AI for content creation reaches a level of benefit to humanity to warrant the environmental cost.

We also consider the negative effects of Generative AI content on humanity. Research by MIT indicates that using ChatGPT to write essays contributes to cognitive decline in students, and that the more users talked to ChatGPT, the lonelier they felt. Chatbots played a significant role in the deaths by suicide of multiple children and adults. In other cases, chatbots engaged in sexual conversations with minors, and there are deepfake videos online of pornography using nonconsensual images of women and children.

As AI use in general increases, it becomes harder to avoid. We do see a difference in Generative AI for content creation and other AI tools, such as simple translators, editing software, and simple grammar and spelling checkers that point out common errors within the user’s own created content. AI research tools are also practically unavoidable. We believe in an abundance of caution when using AI for research or translation, as Generative AI is known to “hallucinate” and can return false information. AI translators are not sophisticated enough to serve as a replacement for a human translator. However, we do not include this type of AI use in prohibited activities for staff/board members, and this type of AI use does not impact our decisions regarding potential grantees. Research on AI and its impact may require its use and is also not a prohibited activity.

We do not condone the use of AI writing tools that generate written work or rewrite a user’s writing into a different style. If we suspect an application or a scholarship essay has been AI generated, we will run it through a Generative AI detector. We will not base decisions solely on the result of the detector, as we are aware that false positives are possible, but it will factor into our decision-making process.

We publish our Generative AI Policy to provide transparency to potential and current grantees about our operations and priorities. If there are questions about the Nora Roberts Foundation Generative AI Policy, grantees and applicants can contact kat@norarobertsfoundation.org and adanna@norarobertsfoundation.org.

AI Definitions

“Artificial Intelligence or AI for short is generally defined as the general ability of computers to emulate human thought and perform tasks in real-world environments – such as perceiving, analyzing, understanding and collating for synthesizing.“
(https://systemicalternatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/rs-09-ai-1.pdf pg. 4)

Generative AI: “Generative AI refers to deep-learning models that can generate high-quality text, images, and other content based on the data they were trained on.”
(https://research.ibm.com/blog/what-is-generative-AI)


References

AI Editorial Team. (2025, November 5). From misinformation to missteps: Hidden consequences of AI hallucinations. Senior Executive.
https://seniorexecutive.com/ai-model-hallucinations-risks/

Authors Guild. (2025, November 11).Practical tips for authors to protect their works from AI use. The Authors Guild.
https://authorsguild.org/news/practical-tips-for-authors-to-protect-against-ai-use-ai-copyright-notice-and-web-crawlers/

Berreby, D. (2024, February 6). As use of A.I. soars, so does the energy and water it requires.
Yale E360. https://e360.yale.edu/features/artificial-intelligence-climate-energy-emissions

Bonifield, S. (2025, November 3). Studio Ghibli, Bamdai Namco, Square Enix demand openai Stop using their content to train AI. The Verge.
https://www.theverge.com/news/812545/coda-studio-ghibli-sora-2-copyright-infringement

Brittain, B. (2025, March 18). US Appeals Court rejects copyrights for ai-generated art lacking“human” creator | Reuters. Reuters.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-appeals-court-rejects-copyrights-ai-generated-art-lacking-human-creator-2025-03-18/

Chow, A. R. (2025, June 23). CHATGPT’s impact on our brains according to an MIT study=. Time.
https://time.com/7295195/ai-chatgpt-google-learning-school/

Drew, M. (2025, August 24). Ethical issues in AI - Carleton College. Carleton.
https://www.carleton.edu/writing/resources-for-faculty/working-with-ai/ethical-issues/

Fang, C. M., Liu, A. R., Danry, V., Lee, E., Chan, S. W. T., Pataranutaporn, P., Maes, P., Phang, J., Lampe, M., & Agarwal, S. (2025). How AI and human behaviors shape psychosocial effects of extended chatbot use: A longitudinal controlled study. MIT Media Lab.
https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/how-ai-and-human-behaviors-shape-psychosocial-effects-of-chatbot-use-a-longitudinal-controlled-study/

Federspiel, F., Mitchell, R., Asokan, A., Umana, C., & McCoy, D. (2023). Threats by artificial intelligence to human health and human existence. BMJ Global Health, 8(5).
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2022-010435

Furizal, Ma’arif, A., Maghfiroh, H., Suwarno, I., Prayogi, D., Kariyamin, Lonang, S., & Sharkawy, A.-N. (2025). Social, legal, and ethical implications of ai-generated deepfake pornography on digital platforms: A Systematic Literature Review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101882.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101882

Gannon, A. (2025, October 29). Responsible AI: Tips to equip your team with ethical best practices. BWF.
https://www.bwf.com/7-ethical-considerations-when-implementing-ai-at-nonprofits/

Guarino, M. (2025, November 2). AI chatbot dangers: Are there enough guardrails to protect children and other vulnerable people?. ABC News.
https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Technology/chatbot-dangers-guardrails-protect-children-vulnerable-people/story?id=127099944

Judah, J. (2025, September 25). How AI and Wikipedia have sent vulnerable languages into a doom spiral. MIT Technology Review.
https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/09/25/1124005/ai-wikipedia-vulnerable-languages-doom-spiral/

Kosmyna, N., Hauptmann, E., Yuan, Y. T., Situ, J., Liao, X.-H., Beresnitzky, A. V., Braunstein, I., & Maes, P. (2025). Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt When Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2506.08872

Kuppermann, M. (2026, January 12). AI in action: Practical tools and guardrails for smarter, more equitable giving. Exponent Philanthropy.
https://exponentphilanthropy.org/blog/ai-in-action-practical-tools-and-guardrails-for-smarter-more-equitable-giving/

Malig, M. L. (2023). The Amazing Artificial Intelligence *at the Cost of Ethics, Theft, Racist Algorithms, Invasion of Privacy, and Violation of Rights?
https://systemicalternatives.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/rs-09-ai-1.pdf

Miller, K. L. (2024, October 10). Concerns about AI from nonprofit organizations and marketing professionals. Nonprofit Marketing Guide (NPMG).
https://www.nonprofitmarketingguide.com/concerns-about-ai-from-nonprofit-communications-and-marketing-professionals/#:~:text=The%20need%20to%20train%20staff,contrary%20to%20the%20organization’s%20values.

Noel, K. (2024, April 22). Journalist Emanuel Maiberg addresses AI and the rise of Deepfake Pornography | Institute of Global Politics | Sipa. Institute of Global Politics.
https://igp.sipa.columbia.edu/news/rise-deepfake-pornography

O’Donnell, J. (2025, September 22). We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. here’s the story you haven’t heard. MIT Technology Review.
hhttps://www.technologyreview.com/2025/05/20/1116327/ai-energy-usage-climate-footprint-big-tech/

Perkins, T. (2025, October 4). Advocates raise alarm over pfas pollution from datacenters amid Ai Boom. The Guardian.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/oct/04/pfas-pollution-data-centers-ai

Sun, Y., Sheng, D., Zhou, Z., & Wu, Y. (2024). AI hallucination: Towards a comprehensive classification of distorted information in artificial intelligence-generated content. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1).
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03811-x /p>

Tangermann, V. (2026, January 16). Researchers just found something that could shake the AI industry to its core. Futurism.
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/ai-industry-recall-copyright-books

Veltman, C. (2025, June 26). In a first-of-its-kind decision, an AI company wins a copyright infringement lawsuit brought by authors. NPR.
https://www.npr.org/2025/06/25/nx-s1-5445242/federal-rules-in-ai-companys-favor-in-landmark-copyright-infringement-lawsuit-authors-bartz-graeber-wallace-johnson-anthropic

Vu. (2025, September 16). The ethics and opportunities of Artificial Intelligence in the nonprofit sector. Nonprofit AF.
https://www.nonprofitaf.com/the-ethics-and-opportunities-of-artificial-intelligence-in-the-nonprofit-sector/

Wells, S. (2025, June 11). Exploring the dangers of AI in mental health care. Stanford HAI.
https://hai.stanford.edu/news/exploring-the-dangers-of-ai-in-mental-health-care

Wierman, A. (2024, December 10). Air pollution and the public health costs of ai. Caltech Division of Engineering and Applied Science.
https://www.eas.caltech.edu/news/air-pollution-and-the-public-health-costs-of-ai

Wikipedia. (2026, January 29). Deaths linked to Chatbots.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deaths_linked_to_chatbots /p>

Yanez-Barnuevo, M. (2025, June 25). Data Centers and water consumption. EESI.
https://www.eesi.org/articles/view/data-centers-and-water-consumption

Yang, A., Jarret, L., & Gallagher, F. (2025, April 26). The family of teenager who died by suicide alleges OpenAI’s Chatgpt is to blame. NBCNews.com.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna226147

Zirpoli, C. T. (2025, July 18). Generative Artificial Intelligence and Copyright Law | congress.gov | Library of Congress. Congress.gov.
https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB10922